« Previous
Next »
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 10, Issue 3
, Pages 156-157
, September 2010
Replacement Rates may Vary for Amalgam Versus Nonmetal Restorations
References
- Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:775–783
- . Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003;31:395–405
- . Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement and resin-based composite materials. J Dent. 1993;21:338–343
- . A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998;26:311–317
- . The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:763–772
- . The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52:234–242
- . The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:58–63
- . Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;50:97–101
- . Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;50:361–366
- . Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent. 1997;25:459–473
- . Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508
PII: S1532-3382(10)00133-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2010.06.002
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 10, Issue 3
, Pages 156-157
, September 2010
