Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 225-226 , December 2008

Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations is Relevant in Class II Cavities

References 

  1. Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Oper Dent. 2003;28(6):681–688
  2. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26(7):555–562
  3. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–783
  4. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):763–772
  5. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent. 2002;27(5):423–429

PII: S1532-3382(08)00173-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.005

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 225-226 , December 2008