Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 83-84, June 2008

The Risk of Failure is Higher for Composites than for Amalgam Restorations

Department of Dentistry, Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial

Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, et al.

J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(6):775-83

Level of Evidence

2

Purpose/Question

How does the survival rate for composite restorations in children compare to amalgam restorations?

Source of Funding

Government

Type of Study/Design

Randomized controlled trial

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1532-3382(08)00058-4

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.03.007

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 83-84, June 2008

Article Tools