Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 114-115, September 2007

Two-Implant Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses Provide a Viable Treatment Alternative to 3-Implant Designs

Head of Restorative Dentistry, King’s College London Dental Institute at Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, Floor 25, Guy’s Tower,Guy’s Hospital Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

Fixed partial prostheses supported by 2 or 3 implants: a retrospective study up to 18 years.

Eliasson A, Eriksson T, et al.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(4):567-74.

Level of Evidence

2B

Purpose/Question

How does the long-term success and complication rate of 2- and 3-implant supported fixed partial prostheses compare?

Source of Funding

Government

Type of Study/Design

Cohort study

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 www.kcl.ac.uk/dentistry

 http://myprofile.cos.com/palmer35

PII: S1532-3382(07)00092-9

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2007.05.015

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 114-115, September 2007

Article Tools