Glass-Ionomer Fissure Sealant May Not Be as Effective as Resin-Based Sealant in Preventing Caries

References 

1. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004;Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001830. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub2.
2. Arrow P, Riordan PJ. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1995;23(5):282–285
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resinbased fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1998;26(1):21–25
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2001;29:
5. Seppa L, Forss H. Resistance of occlusal fissures to demineralization after loss of glass ionomer sealants in vitro. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13(1):39–42Jan-Feb
   • MEDLINE
6. Songpaisan Y, Bratthall D, Phantumvanit P, Somridhivej Y. Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1995;23(1):25–29
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef