Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 6-15 , March 2006

What Does the Precautionary Principle Mean for Evidence-Based Dentistry?

  • Joel Tickner, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Health and Sustainability, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA
    • ,
  • Melissa Coffin, BA

      Affiliations

    • Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA

References 

  1. Raffensperger C, Tickner J. Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1999;
  2. Nightengale F. Notes on nursing: what it is and what it is not. 1859 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1992;
  3. Kriebel D, Tickner J. Re-energizing public health through precaution. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1351–1355
  4. O'Riordan T, Cameron J, Jordan A, eds. 2001. Reinterpreting the precautionary principle. London: Cameron and May; 2000.
  5. O'Brien M. Making better environmental decisions: an alternative to risk assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000;
  6. Fiorino D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values. 1990;15(2):226–244
  7. Tickner J. Democratic participation: a critical element of precautionary public health decision-making. New Solutions. 2001;11:93–111
  8. Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler E, et al. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:871–876
  9. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In:  Krimsky S,  Golding D editor. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1992;p. 251–274
  10. McMichael A. Planetary overload: global environmental change and the health of the human species. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993;
  11. Colborn T, Clement C. Chemically-induced alterations in sexual and functional development: the wildlife/human connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishing; 1992;
  12. Schwartz S, Carpenter K. The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1175–1180
  13. Cairns J. Absence of certainty is not synonymous with absence of risk. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(2):A1–A3
  14. U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Preambles: methylene chloride v. health effects. Available at: http://www.osha-slc.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=PREAMBLES&p_id=10051997;Accessed December 11, 2003
  15. Roelofs C, Ellenbecker M. Source reduction for prevention of methylene chloride hazards: cases from four industrial sectors. Environmental health: a global access science source. 2003;2:9. Available at: http://www.ehjournal.net. Accessed February 4, 2006.
  16. In:  Tickner J editors. Precaution, environmental science and preventive public policy. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003;
  17. Tickner J. Environmental health: a global access science source. Precaution in practice: a framework for implementing the precautionary principle [dissertation]. Lowell, MA: Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell; 2000;
  18. Kriebel, D, Tickner J, Crumbley C. 2003. Appropriate science: evaluating environmental risks for a sustainable world. Paper presented at: Education for Sustainable Development, Committee on Industrial Theory and Assessment, University of Massachusetts Lowell; October 23-4, 2003; Lowell, MA.
  19. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295–300
  20. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem solving. BMJ. 1995;310:1122–1126
  21. Victoria C, Habicht J, Bryce J. Evidence-based public health: Moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:400–405
  22. Kohatsu N, Robinson J, Torner J. Evidence-based public health: an evolving concept. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:417–421
  23. Slavin R. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:9–18
  24. Stoto M. Research synthesis for public health policy: experience of the institute of medicine. In:  Stangl D,  Berry D editor. Meta-Analysis in medicine and health policy. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2000;p. 321–357
  25. Stirling A, Tickner J. Implementing precaution: assessment and application tools for health and environmental decision making. In:  Martuzzi M,  Tickner J editor. The Precautionary Principle: protecting public health, the environment and the future of our children. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2004;
  26. Neutra R, DelPizzo V. Transparent democratic foresight strategies in the California EMF program. Public Health Rep. 2002;117:553–563
  27. Dreborg K. Essence of backcasting. Futures. 1996;28(9):813–828
  28. Jackson T. Clean production strategies. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1993;
  29. Geiser K. Why the country needs a nationwide health tracking network. Materials matter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001;
  30. See www.health-track.org. Pew Environmental Health Commission. Accessed February 4, 2006
  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Water fluoridation: questions and answers. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/waterfluoridation/faqs.htmAccessed September 1, 2005
  32. American Dental Association. Fluoride and fluoridation. Available at: http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/index.aspAccessed July 28, 2005
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Press release July 11, 2005. After 60 years of success in fighting dental decay, water fluoridation is still lacking in many communities. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/OralHealth/pressreleases/wf_lacking.htmAccessed August 31, 2005
  34. Letter from Robert C. Thurnau, Chief Treatment Technology Evaluation Branch, US EPA, to Roger D Masters, Research Professor, Dartmouth College. 16 Nov 2000. Available at www.fluoridealert.org/fda.htm
  35. Diesendorf M. The mystery of declining tooth decay. Nature. 1986;322:125–129
  36. American Dental Association. Fluoridation facts. 2005. Available at: http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/fluoridation_facts.pdfAccessed September 1, 2005
  37. Hileman B. New study casts doubt on fluoridation benefits. Chem Eng News. 1989;8 May. Vol 67:5-6
  38. WHO (Online). WHO Oral Health Country/Area Profile Programme. Department of Noncommunicable Diseases Surveillance/Oral Health. WHO Collaborating Centre, Malmö University, Sweden. Available at: http://www.whocollab.od.mah.se/euro.htmlAccessed August 24, 2005
  39. Petersson GH, Bratthall D. The caries decline: a review of reviews. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104(4(Pt 2)):436–443
  40. Reich E. Trends in caries and periodontal health epidemiology in Europe. International Dentistry Journal. 2001;51(6 Suppl 1):392–398
  41. Dental Health Foundation. The neglected epidemic—Sealants. Available at: http://www.dentalhealthfoundation.org/topics/children/assessment/13.shtmlAccessed August 29, 2005
  42. Von Burg MM, Sanders B, Weddell J. Baby bottle tooth decay: a concern for all mothers. Pediatr Nurs. 1995;21:515–519
  43. Zimmer S, John K, Barthel C, et al. Recommendations for the use of fluoride in caries prevention. Oral Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;1:45–51
  44. Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility. In harm's way: toxic threats to childhood development. 2000;May:90-2.
  45. Bryson C. The fluoride deception. New York: Seven Stories Press; 2004;
  46. Begley S. Fluoridation, cancer: did researchers ask the right questions? Wall Street Journal. July 22, 2005, B1.
  47. American Dental Association. ADA positions and statements. Available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/statements/fluoride3.aspAccessed September 1, 2005
  48. American Dental Association. Restoring your smile: dental filling choices. Available at: http://www.ada.org/public/topics/documents/kit_restorative.pdfAccessed September 1, 2005
  49. American Dental Association. ADA Statement on dental amalgam. Available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/statements/amalgam.aspAccessed September 1, 2005
  50. US Public Health Service. Toxicological profile for mercury update. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Atlanta: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1993:25. TP-93-10.
  51. Marlowe M, Cossairt A, Moon C, MacNeal A. Main and interactive effects of metallic toxins on classroom behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1985;13(2):185–198
  52. Moon C, Marlowe M, Stellem J, Erreva J. Main and interactive effect of metallic pollutants on cognitive functioning. J Learn Disabil. 1985;13:185–198
  53. Leong CW, Syed N, Lorscheider F. Retrogade regeneration of neurite membrane structural integrity of nerve growth cones following in vitro exposure to mercury. Neuroreport. 2001;12(4):733–737March
  54. Berlin M. Mercury in dental-filling materials—an updated risk analysis in environmental medical terms. Available at http://www.dentalmaterial.gov.se/Mercury.pdf2003;Accessed September 1, 2005
  55. Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate. Mercury—investigation of a general ban. Sundyberg, Sweden: Author, 2004.
  56. Dun A. Harmful vapors in the office: a report of the findings of ODA/RCDS survey of mercury vapor in dental offices in Ontario. Ont Dent. 1998;4:37–38
  57. Patterson JE, Weisberg BG, Dennison P. Mercury in human breath from dental amalgam. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1985;34:459–468
  58. Gay DD, Cox RD, Reinhardt JW. Chewing releases mercury from fillings. Corresp Lancet. 1979;1(8123):985–986
  59. Svare CW, Peterson LC, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Frank CW, Gay DD, et al. The effects of dental amalgam on mercury levels in expired air. Journal of Dental Research. 1981;60:1668–1671
  60. Reinhardt JW, Boyer D, Srare C, Frank C, Cox R, Gay D. Exhaled mercury following removal and insertion of amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49(5):652–656
  61. US Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury health effects update. Final report. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment; 1984. EPA-600/8-84-019F.
  62. Goldwater LJ, Ladd AC, Jacobs MB. Absorption and excretion of mercury in man: significance of mercury in blood. Arch Environ Health. 1964;9:735–741
  63. Fox A. Pros and cons of composite fillings. Available at: www.Allanfox.�ca. Accessed August 31, 2005.
  64. Aandahl LS. Paper presented at: the 2005 International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant in Slovenia. A National Clinical Guideline for the use of Dental Filing Materials in Norway. 6-27 through 7-2 2004. Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  65. Leistevuo J, Leistevuo T, Helenius H, Pyy L, Huovinen P, Tenovuo J. Mercury in saliva and the risk of exceeding limits for sewage in relation to exposure to amalgam fillings. Arch Environ Health. 2002;57(4):366–370
  66. Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Welfare. Directive for the use of dental filling materials in Norway: information to dentists about the use of dental materials for restoring single teeth. Unofficial translation by Maryanne Rygg, March 2003. Available at: www.toxicteeth.net/guidelinesinnorway17march2003.doc. Accessed 2/6/06.
  67. Miljøstyrelsen. Alternative material for amalgam. Summary and conclusion of report by the Danish Ministry for Environment and Energy. Available at: www.mst.dk. Accessed September 7, 2005.
  68. Ministry of Health, New Zealand Department of Health. Precautionary advice for dentists and pregnant women. MOH: News and Issues Media Release. July 27, 1999.
  69. Levenson J. Mercury amalgams and metal in the mouth—some facts. Available at: www.mercuryfree.co.uk/mercuryAccessed January 11, 2002
  70. US Public Health Service. Dental amalgam and alternative restorative materials: highlights of the report. From the Working Group on Dental Amalgam to the Environmental Health Policy Committee, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. October 1997.
  71. Krishnan AV, Stathis P, Permuth SF, Tokes L, Feldman D. Bisphenol-a: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology. 1993;132(6):2279–2286
  72. Swedish Association of Dental Mercury Patients. Alternative restorative materials. [Leif Hedegard Web site, 1994-1998. Updated 12 September 1998.]. Available at: http://www.algonet.se/∼leif/AmFAQk06.htmlAccessed August 31, 2005
  73. Schmaltz G. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(2 Pt 2):696–706
  74. National Institutes of Health. Effects and side effects of dental restorative materials. Technology Assessment Conference Statement, August 26-28, 1991. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, Office of Medical Applications of Research. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/1991/1991DentalRestorativeMaterialsta009html.htm. Accessed February 4, 2006.
  75. Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Welfare. National clinical guideline for the use of dental filling materials. Norway: Directorate for Health and Social Affairs, 2003.
  76. Goldstein B. The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1358–1361
  77. European Environment Agency. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1898-1998. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency; 2002;

PII: S1532-3382(05)00239-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.12.006

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 6-15 , March 2006

Article Tools