Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 205-206 , December 2005

Stainless steel crowns improve success rate of root canal treatment in primary teeth

References 

  1. Moskovitz M, Sammara F, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent. 2005;33:41–47
  2. Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Root fillings with Endoflas in primary teeth: a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;27:41–45
  3. Coll JA, Josell J, Casper JS. Evaluation of a one-appointment formocresol pulpectomy technique for primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7:123–129
  4. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:57–63
  5. Barr ES, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of primary molar pulpectomies. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:4–9
  6. Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:403–407
  7. Holan G, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of pulpotomized primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:212–216
  8. Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:278–286
  9. Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term follow-up on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:249–253

PII: S1532-3382(05)00180-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.09.011

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 205-206 , December 2005