Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 19-21 , March 2005

Comparison of 2 treatment concepts for implant-supported bar-retained overdentures demonstrates equivalence regarding efficacy and safety

REFERENCES 

  1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:601–602
  2. Wismeyer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI. Overdentures supported by ITI implants: a 6.5-year evaluation of patient satisfaction and prosthetic aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:744–749
  3. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:260–273
  4. Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, van der Reijden WA, van Winkelhoff AJ, Stegenga B. Two-stage IMZ implants and ITI implants inserted in a single-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:371–380
  5. Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:522–526

PII: S1532-3382(05)00013-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.01.010

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 19-21 , March 2005

Article Tools