Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 22-23, March 2005

Conventional mucogingival surgery is more effective than guided tissue regeneration in root coverage procedures

Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Original Article

Al-Hamdan K, Eber R, Sarment D, Kowalski C, Wang H-L. Guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage: meta analysis. J Periodontol 2003;74(10):1520-33.

Level of Evidence

2a

Purpose

To determine whether guided tissue regeneration (GTR) provides improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional mucogingival surgery for root coverage procedures

Source of Funding

University of Michigan Periodontal Graduate Student Research Fund

Type of Study/Design

Systematic analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1532-3382(05)00003-5

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.01.002

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 22-23, March 2005

Article Tools