Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 283-285 , December 2004

Patient preference for ultrasonic scaling is not clearly demonstrated

REFERENCES 

  1. Soolari A. Compliance and its role in successful treatment of an advanced periodontal case: review of the literature and a case report. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:389–396
  2. Konig J, Plagmann HC, Ruhling A, Kocher T. Tooth loss and pocket probing depths in compliant periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis. J Clinl Periodontol. 2002;29:1092–1100
  3. Ainamo J, Ainamo A. Risk assessment of recurrence of disease during supportive periodontal care. Epidemiological considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(3 Pt 2):232–239
  4. Nevins M. Long-term periodontal maintenance in private practice. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(3 Pt 2):273–277
  5. Konig J, Plagmann HC, Langenfeld N, Kocher T. Retrospective comparison of clinical variables between compliant and non-compliant patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(3):227–232
  6. Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal diagnosis in treated periodontitis. Why, when and how to use clinical parameters. J Clin Periodontol 2996;23(3 Pt 2):240-250
  7. AAP Committee on Research, Science and Therapy. Position Paper, Sonic and Ultrasonic Scalers in Periodontics. Approved by the Board of Trustees of the AAP, August 2000. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1792–1801

PII: S1532-3382(04)00121-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2004.10.003

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 283-285 , December 2004

Article Tools